AMP Finance Ltd v Heaven [2022] NZHC 1414 is a New Zealand High Court case concerning the enforceability of a loan agreement and the application of the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA). The case provides valuable insight into responsible lending practices and the consequences of non-compliance.
AMP Finance sought to recover funds from Mr. Heaven under a loan agreement. Mr. Heaven argued that AMP Finance had breached its obligations under the CCCFA, specifically concerning responsible lending. He claimed that AMP Finance failed to adequately assess his ability to repay the loan, particularly given his financial circumstances at the time. He also alleged that the lender failed to make reasonable inquiries into his financial situation before advancing the funds.
The court focused on whether AMP Finance had acted as a responsible lender as required by the CCCFA. This involved examining the steps taken by AMP Finance to ascertain Mr. Heaven’s income, expenses, and existing debts. A key issue was whether AMP Finance reasonably relied on the information provided by Mr. Heaven, or whether they should have made further inquiries to verify its accuracy.
The judge analyzed the documentation related to the loan application and the evidence presented by both parties. This included scrutinizing the affordability assessment conducted by AMP Finance, considering whether it was robust enough to identify potential issues with Mr. Heaven’s repayment capacity. The court also looked at whether AMP Finance had adequately explained the terms and conditions of the loan to Mr. Heaven and whether he understood the risks associated with taking on the debt.
Ultimately, the court found in favor of Mr. Heaven, holding that AMP Finance had failed to comply with its responsible lending obligations under the CCCFA. The court determined that AMP Finance had not adequately assessed Mr. Heaven’s ability to repay the loan without substantial hardship. It found that the lender should have made further inquiries into his financial situation given the information available to them at the time. As a result of AMP Finance’s breaches of the CCCFA, the court reduced the amount Mr. Heaven was required to repay under the loan agreement. This reduction reflected the harm suffered by Mr. Heaven as a consequence of AMP Finance’s non-compliance.
AMP Finance Ltd v Heaven serves as a reminder to lenders of the importance of adhering to the principles of responsible lending as enshrined in the CCCFA. It highlights the need for thorough affordability assessments and the obligation to make reasonable inquiries to verify information provided by borrowers. The case underscores that lenders cannot simply rely on borrower-provided information without exercising due diligence. Failure to meet these obligations can have significant consequences, including the potential for reduced repayment obligations and reputational damage for the lender.