Understanding the FTD Masters in Finance Ranking

The Financial Times (FTD) Masters in Finance ranking is a highly respected and influential list that evaluates postgraduate finance programs worldwide. It’s a key benchmark for prospective students aiming for successful careers in finance, and for institutions looking to enhance their program’s reputation.

Key Ranking Criteria

The FTD ranking is based on a comprehensive set of criteria, broadly categorized into three main pillars:

• Career Progression: This is a significant component, focusing on the salary of alumni three years after graduation, the salary increase compared to their pre-program salary, and the career service offered by the school. It directly reflects the program’s ability to enhance graduates’ earning potential and career advancement.
• School Diversity: This includes the gender balance of students and faculty, the international diversity of the student body and faculty, and the representation of women on the school’s advisory board. A diverse learning environment is valued as it fosters broader perspectives and prepares students for the global finance industry.
• International Experience & Research: This category considers the international mobility of alumni, the international course experience, and the quality of faculty research. Schools with strong international links and impactful research contribute to a more comprehensive and globally relevant education.

Other important metrics include the aims achieved by graduates, the value for money offered by the program, and the overall satisfaction of alumni.

Impact and Significance

A high ranking in the FTD Masters in Finance ranking can have a substantial impact on a business school. It attracts high-quality students, enhances the school’s reputation among employers, and contributes to increased funding and research opportunities. For prospective students, the ranking provides a valuable tool for comparing different programs and making informed decisions about their education.

Criticisms and Considerations

While the FTD ranking is widely respected, it’s not without its critics. Some argue that the emphasis on salary outcomes might favor certain career paths over others, and that the methodology could be biased towards schools in developed countries. Furthermore, the ranking only includes schools that meet specific criteria, such as having a minimum number of graduates and being accredited by certain bodies. Therefore, it’s important to consider the ranking in conjunction with other factors, such as program curriculum, faculty expertise, and personal career goals, when choosing a Masters in Finance program. The ranking should be viewed as one data point among many.