Amigo Holdings PLC, operating under the trading name Amigo Loans, is a controversial British guarantor loan company. Its subsidiary, AmicusHorizon Finance PLC, plays a crucial role in the overall structure, acting as a conduit for funding and managing the bond obligations that underpin Amigo’s lending activities.
Amigo Loans, prior to its significant financial difficulties, specialized in providing guarantor loans to individuals with poor credit histories who were often unable to secure financing from mainstream lenders. These loans required a friend or family member to act as a guarantor, promising to repay the debt if the borrower defaulted. While this model opened up access to credit for some, it was heavily criticized for its high interest rates, often exceeding 49.9% APR, and for potentially trapping both borrowers and guarantors in cycles of debt.
AmicusHorizon Finance PLC is the entity responsible for issuing and managing the bonds that Amigo uses to finance its lending activities. Institutional investors purchase these bonds, providing Amigo with the capital necessary to issue guarantor loans. The repayments from these loans are then used to service the interest and principal on the bonds. This securitization model is common in the financial industry, allowing companies to raise large sums of capital by packaging and selling debt obligations to investors.
However, Amigo’s business model and the role of AmicusHorizon Finance PLC became increasingly unsustainable due to a surge in customer complaints regarding irresponsible lending practices and unaffordable loans. Many customers argued that Amigo had not properly assessed their ability to repay the loans and had relied too heavily on the guarantors, often without fully explaining the risks involved. This led to a wave of compensation claims and regulatory scrutiny from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The mounting complaints and the FCA’s investigation put significant financial strain on Amigo. The company struggled to manage the increasing volume of compensation claims while also trying to maintain its lending activities. This ultimately led to Amigo entering into a period of financial difficulty and proposing a scheme of arrangement to its creditors, including bondholders represented by AmicusHorizon Finance PLC.
Several schemes of arrangement were proposed and rejected, reflecting the complex and often conflicting interests of different stakeholder groups, including borrowers, guarantors, and bondholders. The schemes aimed to limit the compensation paid out to customers, allowing Amigo to restructure its debts and potentially continue operating. However, many critics argued that the schemes were unfair to borrowers and guarantors, who deserved full compensation for the mis-selling of loans.
The future of Amigo and AmicusHorizon Finance PLC remains uncertain. The company continues to navigate a complex legal and regulatory landscape, seeking to find a sustainable path forward while addressing the legitimate concerns of its creditors and those who were negatively impacted by its lending practices. The case highlights the potential risks associated with high-cost credit products and the importance of responsible lending practices and robust regulatory oversight.